When the Japanese military successfully attack Pearl Harbor, that means trouble for certain Americans who do not want to see U.S. military might used against Nazi Germany, with whom they sympathize.

But once the U.S. declares war on Japan, Germany declares war on the USA. At that point, Americans who are doing business with Germany have what should have been an easy decision to make...

An article is published in the New York Herald-Tribune, under the headline "Hitler's Angel Has $3 Million in U.S. Bank". It informs the American people that certain U.S. banking interests are helping to finance the German war machine while the U.S. is at war with Germany! Though not named in the article (but see Skull & Bones member Prescott Bush, in association with George Herbert Walker, whose daughter he'd married, sought to conceal his managing role in a financial alliance with German industrialist Fritz Thyssen, who'd personally funded Adolf Hitler's rise to power.

3 generations of traitorous Bushes

After the war, a Congressional investigation would later show that Bush's Nazi-front banking operation had helped the Vereinigte Stahlwerke (United Steel Works Corporation or German Steel Trust) to produce 35% of Nazi Germany's explosives and about 41% of its steel.

In other words, during time of war, Prescott Bush had helped Nazi Germany to kill American soldiers.

Union Banking Corporation, being run by Prescott Bush, is seized by the U.S. government under the Trading With The Enemy Act (Vesting Order No. 248). article

Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation (Vesting Order No. 259) and Holland-American Trading Corporation (Vesting Order No. 261), also being run by Prescott Bush, are also seized by the U.S. government under the Trading With The Enemy Act. article

More than 2 years later, buried in a brief story on page 25, the New York Times mentions that Union Banking Corporation has been authorized by Congress "to change its principal place of business to 120 Broadway". The Times fails to mention that the company had been seized by the government, or that the new business address was that of the U.S. Office of the Alien Property Custodian (the person in charge of the seized assets). The story also neglects to mention the other, UBC-related, seized companies. article

The U.S. government, rather than prosecuting Prescott Bush for giving aid and comfort to the enemy during time of war, quietly pays him $1.5 million in cash as compensation for the assets of the seized businesses!

No one has ever been able to explain this. But it seems as if members of the "secret society" Skull & Bones are never held accountable for their treasons.

Prescott Bush runs for the U.S. Senate as a Republican from Connecticut.

Keep in mind that in 1950, so soon after years of world war, "Nazi" remained the dirtiest word in America. Surely there are Democrats from Connecticut who'd been in Congress in 1942, and have not forgotten Prescott Bush's dark, treasonous past.

If you were the Democrat candidate for Senate from Connecticut in 1950, what would it have taken to have kept you quiet about what your political opponent did during the war?

The mass media also des not feel compelled to pursue candidate Bush's war past.

Candidate Bush does not win the election.

Prescott Bush runs for the U.S. Senate as a Republican from Connecticut.

Keep in mind that in 1952, so soon after years of world war, "Nazi" remained the dirtiest word in America. Surely there are Democrats from Connecticut who'd been in Congress in 1942, and have not forgotten Prescott Bush's dark, treasonous past.

If you were the Democrat candidate for Senate from Connecticut in 1952, what would it have taken to have kept you quiet about what your political opponent did during the war?

The mass media again does not feel compelled to pursue the supposedly-previously-vetted candidate Bush's war past.

This time candidate Bush does win the election.

Skull & Bones member Prescott Bush was re-elected in 1956. He did not seek re-election in 1962.

During this period, Senator Bush, even though he is not a senior senator, seems to hold some sway over the Executive branch of the U.S. government:

President Eisenhower + Prescott Bush


Vice President Nixon + Prescott Bush


Prescott Bush + President Eisenhower

1953 TV interview: watch d/l d/l d/l

In his last opportunity to address the nation as its leader, former five-star Army General President Dwight D. Eisenhower warns us that "we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist."

click to watch QuickTime video in popup window
right-click to download

Just a few months later, President John F. Kennedy warns us about the danger posed by tolerating excessive secrecy, and permitting members of "secret societies" and the military-industrial(-intelligence-media) complex to slowly covertly subvert our Constitutional Republic from within, right before our eyes.

LISTEN ---> audio <--- JFK in his own words

"The very word 'secrecy' is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings."

"no war ever posed a greater threat to our security. If you are awaiting a finding of 'clear and present danger,' then I can only say that the danger has never been more clear and its presence has never been more imminent.

It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions -- by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence"

"It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed."

Some people feel that this speech (audio) made JFK's fate foreseeable. Some thank him, decades later, for having made it, while most continue to ignore it.

Under the mere threat of impeachment, and following the advice of George Herbert Walker Bush, Richard Nixon resigns the U.S. presidency.

It seems that former CIA director and Vice Presidential candidate George Herbert Walker Bush, in a treasonous act, is involved in negotiations with people connected to the people who'd taken Americans hostage in Iran, to delay their release. (The Reagan-Bush Presidential campaign is concerned that President Carter would get the hostages released in October and win the November election.)

As "coincidence" would have it, the hostages are released just as Reagan and Bush are inaugurated in a split-screen of televised events, January 1981.

The reason we didn't know more about that "coincidence" prior to 2023 is because Democrat Lee Hamilton squelches the House Of Representative's subsequent "investigation" into the matter. This is one of the earlier known occasions on which Democrat Lee Hamilton, CFR member and long-time Bush family fixer, lets "the bad guys" get away with treason. (delve)

In 2023, long-suppressed (incriminating) information finally emerged...

Skull & Bones member George Herbert Walker Bush famously states, regarding the unConstitutional Iran-Contra scam, that "there was no quid pro quo" and "I was not in the loop" (so how would -- how could -- he have known that there was no treasonous quid pro quo?).

Even though the Independent Counsel who investigated the treasonous scandal would find otherwise, fake-opposition Democrats do not raise a ruckus, or even any serious questions, about the treasons behind Bush's mutually dubious statements, even though they control both chambers of Congress.

The mass media also does not feel compelled to pursue Vice President Bush's lies.

In the 2 chambers of Congress, Democrats Lee Hamilton and John Kerry lead the impotent (toothless) investigations. That enables George Herbert Walker Bush to remain free to later, as President, pardon his fellow Iran-Contra traitors.

In the House, CFR member Democrat Lee Hamilton once again lets "the bad guys" get away with treason. (delve)

In the Senate, Skull & Bones member Democrat John Kerry discovers, but somehow manages to fail to uncover, the drug-running aspects of the treasonous Iran-Contra conspiracy. (delve)

George Herbert Walker Bush, in an unusual speech before an uncommon joint session of Congress, announces that our troops are serving overseas "in defense of principle and the dream of a New World Order". (audio video)

Fake-opposition Democrats do not raise a ruckus, or even any questions, about such talk, even though they control both chambers of Congress and had invited the Republican President to address them.

The mass media also does not feel compelled to pursue President Bush's then-curious NWO remarks, which have since been parroted by CFR member Democrat Gary Hart, among others.

President William Jefferson Clinton is impeached.

A married man, Clinton had told a fib, denying an extramarital blow job he'd evidently received.

Republican members of the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives say they have no choice in the matter; that it is their Constitutional obligation and sworn duty to impeach the lying horny bastard.

Such unidirectional hyper-opposition over a Constitutionally trivial matter makes it seem as if both [sic] political parties truly (and bitterly) oppose one another. It also leaves the false impression that no transgression against the Constitution, no matter how small, can ever be ignored by Congress.

Skull & Bones member President George Walker Bush, in a loose-lips-sink-ships kind of way, while answering a question about how he felt when he learned of the September 11th attack, reveals that he had watched the 1st tower being struck, on TV, before he entered that Florida classroom at 9 a.m. (transcript audio) (However, the only known video of the 1st WTC impact did not surface until after midinght. Further, the widely-televised views of the 2nd tower impact did not occur until after Bush had entered the classroom.)

Fake-opposition Democrats never raise any ruckus, or even any questions, about Bush's admission. They just pretend he never made it!

The mass media also does not feel compelled to pursue President Bush's remarkable remark.

George Walker Bush, in a loose-lips-sink-ships kind of way, while answering a question about the first thing that went through his head when he learned of the initial WTC attack, reiterates that he had watched the 1st tower being struck, on TV, before he entered that Florida classroom at 9 a.m. (transcript audio) (But the only known video of the 1st WTC impact did not surface until after midinght. Further, the widely-televised views of the 2nd tower impact did not occur until after Bush had entered the classroom.)

In other words, George Walker Bush has twice told us that, in effect, he was in the loop on the very beginning of the "surprise" attack. Is Bush the only person in the world who 'forgot', within a few months, how he'd learned about the attack, or has he revealed the existence of a secret video we're not supposed to know about; a video whose existence would indicate that Bush had access to a communications network that had "anticipated" the "secret surprise terrorist" attack?

Fake-opposition Democrats never raise a ruckus, or even any questions, about Bush's statements. They just pretend he never made them!!

The mass media also fails to pursue President Bush's revealing statements, even though the Department of Defense's response to a FOIA request indicates a White House cover-up.

We cannot observe motives but we can observe behaviors: After President Bush and Vice President Cheney asks Senate majority leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) to not investigate the events of 9/11, Daschle (ie, the U.S. Senate) complies. Apparently legislators' oath to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, does not apply if someone in another branch of government asks them to look the other way. So did Daschle ever really want an investigation, or did he just need the fantastic requests to serve as political cover for his willing failure to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic?

On March 6, 2003, with an illegal (Nuremberg War Crime) war approaching, George Walker Bush presides over a press conference at which he states that it (who he calls upon next) is "scripted". In other words, pre-arranged; not as spontaneous as it appears. But the way the media goes along with it, and even widely mis-reports it, is equally telling.

watch d/l audio What happened vs. what the media reported
There was this peep, but not much more, from the media.

Not to be out-done in their role of falsely appearing to keep Bush honest, Democrats also do not call upon Bush to account for his role in the exercise in staged U.S. democracy.

Guess what Democrat came out of retirement in order to give "bipartisan" approval (cover) to the 9-11 Commission?

Democrat Lee Hamilton, CFR member and old Bush family fixer, once again lets "the bad guys" get away with treason. And, as always, there was at least one Bush involved. Only this time, thousands of Americans were murdered.

Bush and Cheney were allowed to "testify" together, behind closed doors, not under any kind of oath whatsoever (they'd long since abandoned their oaths of office). The Commissioners, who were clearly not taking seriously this part of their "investigation", agreed to not make any recordings whatsoever, and while they did take notes, they left them at the White House.

The Kean-Hamilton Commission's "complete and final report" of 9/11, among its many smoking-gun omissions, makes no mention whatsoever of Bush's repeated, incriminating, self-implicating witness statements (1 2) regarding a presidential video feed, that morning, of an otherwise-unknown video of the opening salvo of the 'surprise' attack.

It's a good thing there are recordings and official White House transcripts (1 2) of Bush's innocent-sounding but revealing confession statements, or We The People wouldn't know that he had ever made them at all. The statements are important: this Bush has twice publicly inadvertently admitted that he was in the loop on the very beginning of the 'secret' attack, indicating that there was prior knowledge, at the highest level of the U.S. government, of an unfolding attack on Americans. And Democrats act like he didn't.

Presidential candidate and fellow secret society Skull & Bones member Democrat John Kerry will not question George W. Bush about his well-documented but not-widely-known incriminating 9/11 witness statements.

U.S. Senatorial candidate (CO) Democrat Ken Salazar will not question George W. Bush about his well-documented but not-widely-known incriminating 9/11 witness statements. (We don't know if Ken is a CFR member, but his legislative director is.)

U.S. House candidate (CO CD5) and secret society 32nd-degree Freemason Democrat Fred Hardee will not question George W. Bush about his well-documented but not-widely-known incriminating 9/11 witness statements.

We make sure that all 3 federal-level campaigns were well-aware of them, too. That is the only way we know for sure that they are only feigning ignorance.

Following the election...
• U.S. House minority 'leader' (and Speaker-elect) Democrat Nancy "impeachment is off the table" Pelosi (video video audio) has never questioned George W. Bush about his well-documented but not-widely-known incriminating 9/11 witness statements.
• U.S. Senate minority (and later majority) 'leader' Democrat Harry Reid has never questioned George W. Bush about his well-documented but not-widely-known incriminating 9/11 witness statements.
• No elected Democrat ever has.

Clearly, their "opposition" to George W. Bush has never been more than a shallow pretense.

At the 2005 State Of The Union address, partway through George W. Bush's speech, the TV network cameras suddenly, with identifying graphics ready, cut to Senator Joe Biden ("D") who, apparently right on cue, begins applauding, alone, at an inappropriate moment (Bush keeps right on speaking). watch d/l

This is evidently what happens when a change is made to the speech without informing the fake-opposition Democrats and the fake-honest media that the staged event's script has been altered:

It's very embarrassing, and rather revealing, so, of course, it goes unreported.

SAIC candidate Jay Fawcett will not pledge to question George W. Bush about Bush's repeated, incriminating, self-implicating 9/11 witness statements (1 2).

In stuggling to justify his resistance to questioning the official version of events of 9/11, Jay contradicted himself regarding the durations of the top-down annihilations of the twin towers. He was not very honest nor a good liar, even though it was obvious he had studied the topic in preparation for our conversations.

Clearly, his "opposition" to George W. Bush is not genuine.

For years, Democrats whined that they'd like to investigate 9/11, but they had no majority standing or subpoena power, so their hands were tied by those evil Republican agents of darkness (even as Al Gore was proving that one needn't have majority standing to raise another important inconvenient truth).

But, now back in control of the branch of government responsible for holding the Executive branch checked and in balance with the Constitution, Democrats remain unwilling to question the dubious (and impossible!) big lies of the federal government under President George Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney.

In addition to the unquestioned huge lie- and war-spawning lies of 9/11, there is the matter of the outing of CIA spy Valerie Plame (wife of Ambassador Joe Wilson). Which segues into yet another unaddressed scandal: without having even seen the bogus Niger uranium documents, Ambassador Wilson concluded and reported back to the CIA that they could not be believed. (video video)  But Bush and Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz and George Tenet and Colin Powell and Condoleeza Rice acted otherwise, as if the blatantly fraudulent documents could somehow be believed, as they fearfully stampeded a powerful nation into a(nother) bogus war against a(nother) sham enemy.

Did you believe them? Have you ever seen the documents? Could they have fooled you? Could they have fooled a sharp 5th-grader?

Is it more likely that the Executive branch was fooled by these documents, or was lying?

With "political opponent" House Speaker Democrat Nancy "impeachment is off the table" Pelosi (video video audio) pre-emptively ruling out any and all possibility of impeachment (remember: Nixon resigned under the mere threat of impeachment, and Clinton 'had' to be impeached for telling an inconsequential fib about a blow job), does it matter?

Once again, by refusing to even ask the right questions, a look-the-other-way (now Democrat-controlled) Congress refuses to rise to the defense of We The People's Constitution.

By failing to question Bush's well-documented self-implicating 9/11 witness statements, Cheney's unConstitutional seizure of control over the military during 9/11(1), and other crimes against the Constitution and against humanity, Senator Hillary Clinton has failed to uphold her oath of office.

By failing to question Bush's well-documented self-implicating 9/11 witness statements, Cheney's unConstitutional seizure of control over the military during 9/11(1), and other crimes against the Constitution and against humanity, Senator Barack Obama has failed to uphold his oath of office.

note that they'll question each other's statements, but not Bush's repeated public voluntary well-documented treason confession statements

Neither deserves a promotion (nor does Senator John McCain). We The People deserve honest candates who support, rather than help subvert, the U.S. Constitution. We believe We deserve better than yet another distractive divisive round of R<->D regime rotation.

Locally, Democrats are also offering up non-Constitutional candidates for U.S. Senate and House of Representatives:

Mark Udall, who has failed to uphold his oath of office in the U.S. House of Representatives by feigning ignorance of Bush's loose-lips-sink-ships 9/11 confession statements, is seeking an undeserved promotion to the U.S. Senate.

And here in Colorado Congressional district 5, after Fred Hardee (32nd degree Freemason, 2004) and Jay Fawcett (Lt. Col. USAF (ret), SAIC military-industrial complex, 2006), Democrats are offering a Lt. Col. named Hal Bidlack. We've found Hal's bid lacking in integrity (but not hypocrisy), too.

Clearly, their political "opposition" to George W. Bush, and support of the Constitution, is not genuine. When Republicans fail to question a fellow Republican's treason, that seems to merely demonstrate that Republicans put party loyalty ahead of loyalty to the Constitution. But when Democrats continually refuse to question Republican treason, that betrays the fraudulence of the entire duopolistic U.S. political system.

If you're honest with yourself, you'll realize that Mitt Romney is the biggest stiff to run against an incumbent president since last time (John Kerry...)!

Many of the Republican supposed-candidates in the primaries were apparently 'running' with the sole intention of giving Romney's inevitable party nomination the appearance of political gravitas, as if Mitt's mighty campaign had vanquished all the serious alternative candidates for which any Republican-hugger might ever want to vote. For instance, no one in their honest right mind ever seriously considered the acerbic Newt Gingrich to be a viable candidate for president. And Ron Paul, who supposedly was keenly interested in a 4-year term as president, did not even seek re-election to his safe 2-year congressional seat!

Barrack Hussein Obama had for 4 years been an obedient loyal puppet of the corrupt powers that be (forget all that nonsense you may have heard about "socialism" -- which would be a far better bargain for We The People than the present of-the-corporations, by-the-corporations, and for-the-corporations fascist way of life), though if voters -- assuming votes were honestly cast and counted electronically -- preferred a swing to even more fervent fascism, the puppet-masters would not have minded one bit...

Did you also happen to notice how little time was devoted, and attention was paid, to the acknowledged (by the Pentagon) national security threat known as "climate change"? How many more election cycles do you suppose it might be before even the possibility of using fissionless nuclear fusion as an energy source and the solution to virtually all of Our civilization's energy, economic, and ecological concerns can even be mentioned?

here's another, from 2019

- Edward Zehr